I Have submitted a pull request with changes based on this disucssion https://github.com/w3c/html/pull/9 note: also includes an editorial fix. regards Steve On 3 February 2013 12:05, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > I think so. Happy to see your proposal! > Thanks, > Silvia. > > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > >> hi silvia, >> so I take it that the text i suggested is acceptable, if so I will >> include the chnage as part of a proposed update patch for main. >> >> >> regards >> steve >> >> >> On 3 February 2013 09:50, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Silvia, >>>> >>>> >Hmm... so you are suggesting it as a replacement for a <section> >>>> element? >>>> >>>> >>>> the term "main content section" phrase is not new it has been in the >>>> definition of the main element since it was initially defined. >>>> >>>> Are you suggesting it woul be better like this: >>>> >>>> "The main<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-main-element> element >>>> and its children represent<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/rendering.html#represents> >>>> the main content of the body<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-body-element> of >>>> a document or application. " >>>> >>>> if so i agree. >>>> >>> >>> Two motivations why I think it's better: <main> should be able to stand >>> independently without referring to <section> , and I want to minimize >>> differences with the WHATWG spec where possible and acceptable. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Silvia. >>> >> >> >> >> <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html> >> > > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 10:31:13 UTC