I think so. Happy to see your proposal! Thanks, Silvia. On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > hi silvia, > so I take it that the text i suggested is acceptable, if so I will include > the chnage as part of a proposed update patch for main. > > > regards > steve > > > On 3 February 2013 09:50, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi Silvia, >>> >>> >Hmm... so you are suggesting it as a replacement for a <section> >>> element? >>> >>> >>> the term "main content section" phrase is not new it has been in the >>> definition of the main element since it was initially defined. >>> >>> Are you suggesting it woul be better like this: >>> >>> "The main<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-main-element> element >>> and its children represent<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/rendering.html#represents> >>> the main content of the body<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-body-element> of >>> a document or application. " >>> >>> if so i agree. >>> >> >> Two motivations why I think it's better: <main> should be able to stand >> independently without referring to <section> , and I want to minimize >> differences with the WHATWG spec where possible and acceptable. >> >> Thanks! >> Silvia. >> > > > > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html> >
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 12:06:37 UTC