- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:49:35 +1100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>, Gez Lemon <g.lemon@webprofession.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHp8n2kSFXkLUGpp0d2HU4qK8+zBWo1dmQsGWJOXytUBKC1cBg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, I'll look at it when I do the next batch of patches. Silvia. On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > I Have submitted a pull request with changes based on this disucssion > https://github.com/w3c/html/pull/9 > > note: also includes an editorial fix. > > regards > Steve > > > On 3 February 2013 12:05, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I think so. Happy to see your proposal! >> Thanks, >> Silvia. >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> hi silvia, >>> so I take it that the text i suggested is acceptable, if so I will >>> include the chnage as part of a proposed update patch for main. >>> >>> >>> regards >>> steve >>> >>> >>> On 3 February 2013 09:50, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steve Faulkner < >>>> faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Silvia, >>>>> >>>>> >Hmm... so you are suggesting it as a replacement for a <section> >>>>> element? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> the term "main content section" phrase is not new it has been in the >>>>> definition of the main element since it was initially defined. >>>>> >>>>> Are you suggesting it woul be better like this: >>>>> >>>>> "The main<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-main-element> element >>>>> and its children represent<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/rendering.html#represents> >>>>> the main content of the body<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-body-element> of >>>>> a document or application. " >>>>> >>>>> if so i agree. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Two motivations why I think it's better: <main> should be able to stand >>>> independently without referring to <section> , and I want to minimize >>>> differences with the WHATWG spec where possible and acceptable. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Silvia. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html> >>> >> >> > > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html> >
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 10:50:29 UTC