hi silvia, so I take it that the text i suggested is acceptable, if so I will include the chnage as part of a proposed update patch for main. regards steve On 3 February 2013 09:50, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Silvia, >> >> >Hmm... so you are suggesting it as a replacement for a <section> element? >> >> >> the term "main content section" phrase is not new it has been in the >> definition of the main element since it was initially defined. >> >> Are you suggesting it woul be better like this: >> >> "The main<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-main-element> element >> and its children represent<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/rendering.html#represents> >> the main content of the body<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/sections.html#the-body-element> of >> a document or application. " >> >> if so i agree. >> > > Two motivations why I think it's better: <main> should be able to stand > independently without referring to <section> , and I want to minimize > differences with the WHATWG spec where possible and acceptable. > > Thanks! > Silvia. > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 10:07:49 UTC