- From: Tom Wiltzius <wiltzius@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:27:44 -0800
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK-G-KXEm10KJo-uZ1t9==Uh4kz2ykCrdLuzfaUwXQkzMRkPoQ@mail.gmail.com>
I believe we discussed the possibility of moving Canvas2D forward ahead of HTML5 at TPAC and it sounded like it was a legitimate option, process-wise. Is that not the case? On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 26.11.2012 19:50, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > > The Canvas 2D editors believe that our spec should not wait that long. > > The Canvas 2D spec is significantly smaller than the HTML one and is > already implemented with comprehensive test suites on several browsers. > > In addition, the at-risk features (such as hit regions) will most likely > see significant changes in the near future and will end up in the next > revision. > > I don't have informed opinion on how stable and impemented Canvas 2D is. > However it would be quite strange if Canvas 2D as an extension of HTML5 > will gain REC status before HTML5 on top of which is layered. > > Jirka > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Professional XML consulting and training services > DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 02:28:32 UTC