Re: Split Issue 30?

Jonas Sicking:
>> It appears we simply do not agree on how a number of issues (probably
>> including which issues we don't agree on:-) ) so I suspect this
>> thread won't go any further.

Charles Pritchard:
> I think we've reached an agreement regarding your proposal: @hidden
> currently follows display: none, from CSSOM and your proposal seeks to
> have @hidden have its own properties.
> I now understand that you are not trying to alter "display: none" from
> CSSOM.

CSSOM seems entirely irrelevant here.  CSSOM is the spec that defines 
scripted access to CSS style sheets etc.  Maybe by "@hidden currently 
follows display: none, from CSSOM" you mean "@hidden is currently 
defined to hide elements by setting their display property to none 
through a user agent style sheet".

Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 05:37:38 UTC