- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:47:36 -0800
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org
On 2/12/2012 9:36 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: > Jonas Sicking: >>> It appears we simply do not agree on how a number of issues (probably >>> including which issues we don't agree on:-) ) so I suspect this >>> thread won't go any further. > > Charles Pritchard: >> I think we've reached an agreement regarding your proposal: @hidden >> currently follows display: none, from CSSOM and your proposal seeks to >> have @hidden have its own properties. >> I now understand that you are not trying to alter "display: none" from >> CSSOM. > > CSSOM seems entirely irrelevant here. CSSOM is the spec that defines > scripted access to CSS style sheets etc. Maybe by "@hidden currently > follows display: none, from CSSOM" you mean "@hidden is currently > defined to hide elements by setting their display property to none > through a user agent style sheet". Yes, thank you. Sorry I wasn't more specific, I think it would have saved a bit of confusion. -Charles
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 05:48:06 UTC