- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:24:39 -0800
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org
On 2/12/2012 8:23 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> > webkit uses display: none for @hidden. > As I've already stated, the CSSOM and other specifications you are > talking about is irrelevant to the subject matter, which is ISSUE 30, > i.e. how various content is exposed to AT. > > It appears we simply do not agree on how a number of issues (probably > including which issues we don't agree on:-) ) so I suspect this > thread won't go any further. I think we've reached an agreement regarding your proposal: @hidden currently follows display: none, from CSSOM and your proposal seeks to have @hidden have its own properties. I now understand that you are not trying to alter "display: none" from CSSOM. We covered @longdesc cases thoroughly, the proposals are being revised or otherwise have been revised. A survey will happen, again. I think we're all set. -Charles
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 05:25:08 UTC