Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

>
>> As Glenn said, there are many organisations who will not refer to a work
>> in progress.
>>
>
> So the question I have is this: if those organizations refer to the 5.0
> REC and then we issue 5.1, are those organizations going to update to 5.1,
> or continue referencing 5.0?


I most cases I'm aware of, such organizations have previously normatively
referenced HTML4, and now they are looking forward to normatively
referencing HTML5. Is there a trend here?