- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 20:25:40 +0100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > in any of the above a conforming HTML5 authoring tool would be useless if it > could not emit the documents. Maybe we should say that a conforming HTML5 authoring tool MAY emit "non-conforming HTML5 documents" but MUST make the author informed of the (machine-assessable) conformance status of the document when emitting. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Sunday, 5 August 2012 19:26:29 UTC