- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:10:20 -0700
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Apr 15, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > On 14.04.2012 23:59, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> Objection: I object to this task force being >> named the "HTML WG Media Task Force", as >> this implies their area of responsibility would >> be all HTML Media work. ... >> I previously suggested "HTML WG Encrypted Media >> Task Force" and no one objected to this alternate >> name. Changing the name would remove my objection. > > I agree that "Media Task Force" is not appropriate. But "Encrypted Media > Task Force" also is not appropriate for the same reason. > > The Task Force (if it is created at all) should be named in a way which > does not hide the real intentions. Two suggestions: > - Content Protection Task Force I think "Content Protection Task Force" is ok and not unreasonably prejudicial either way. I think the other suggested names are not appropriate. - Maciej > - DRM Task Force > > One could think of even more appropriate names, but they certainly would > have no chance of adoption, for example: > - Protecting Content from Users Task Force > - Broken By Design Task Force > > Cheers, > Andreas > >
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2012 21:10:49 UTC