W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2012

Re: CfC: Create Media Task Force

From: Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:24:04 -0600
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
CC: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "'Mark Watson'" <watsonm@netflix.com>, "'Paul Cotton'" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CBAC941A.1C930%c.stevens@cablelabs.com>
Do we need to have a solution everyone agrees will solve the problem
before we can get permission to ask the question in a structured forum?

It's my understanding that the task force would have the responsibility to
propose a solution that it believes adequately addresses the problem. The
fact that there is major disagreement on a proposed solution seems to me
to be a strong argument for establishing the task force.


On 4/12/12 12:38 PM, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

>On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, John Foliot wrote:
>> Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>> > since that I assume any CDM so documented would fail the Hollywood
>> > placebo test.
>> I appreciate that there are philosophical differences around this
>> but I would hope that philosophy be discussed in another forum, and
>> we focus on technical discussions. "Hollywood", as a legitimate content
>> creator on and for the web, has issues around protecting their
>> base, and the W3C has a legitimate need to hear out and address their
>> concerns to the best of its technical ability to do so.
>Nobody has proposed a mechanism that would actually prevent any kind of
>copyright violation, so your argument doesn't seem relevant here.
>Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
>http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
>Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 20:24:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:51 UTC