- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:49:26 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14524
Summary: Why is <big> element removed, but not the <small>
element? I think big and small are companions, they
are a couple, they're married. Either they should both
stay, or they should both go! It is unfair that one
has to stay, but the other has to go. I think
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top
Comment:
Why is <big> element removed, but not the <small> element?
I think big and small are companions, they are a couple, they're married.
Either they should both stay, or they should both go!
It is unfair that one has to stay, but the other has to go.
I think they are for styling not for semantics, so I think both of them should
get deleted, then people should use CSS instead.
Posted from: 212.247.162.243
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/7.0.1
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 13:49:32 UTC