- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:45:09 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14491
Summary: 'script' and 'style' are not consistent. 'script' have
a 'src' attribute, but 'style' does not have a 'src'
attribute. If the 'script' element is the cousin of
'style', then why doesn't both none of them have the
src attribute? 'link' is used to load styl
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top
Comment:
'script' and 'style' are not consistent.
'script' have a 'src' attribute, but 'style' does not have a 'src' attribute.
If the 'script' element is the cousin of 'style', then why doesn't both none
of them have the src attribute?
'link' is used to load style sheets, but not scripts.
Why is that you load CSS with link, but not JavaScript with link?
Both JavaScript and CSS are external resources and should be loaded in the
same way.
If scripts are loaded with the 'script' element, then why are not style sheets
loaded with the 'style' element?
== Consistent (Good) ==
<script src="script.js">
<style src="style.css">
== Consistent (Good) ==
<link src="script.js">
<link src="style.css">
== Inconsistent (Bad) ==
<link src="script.js">
<style src="style.css">
Posted from: 212.247.162.243
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/7.0.1
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 12:45:19 UTC