- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:37:30 +0300
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:13 -0400, mike amundsen wrote: > Finally, I currently know of four registries that contain some level > of Link Relation content: > IANA - http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xml > Microformats - http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values > Paramsr.us - http://paramsr.us/link-relation-types/ > Dublink Core - http://dublincore.org/documents/dcq-html/ > > Are there others I have not listed here that should be considered? > Should these registries be viewed as a related? a co-operating group? > at odds with each other? From the HTML5 POV, should one or more list > be viewed as "sanctioned" or canonical while others should be viewed > as "rogue" or contrary to standards? Only http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values is referenced from http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types . Thus, the others have no bearing on HTML5. As for the content of http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values , right now the vast majority of the link types documented there are not registered with all the data http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types requires registrations to have, so the pre-existing content on the wiki that doesn't meet the formalities required by HTML5 has to be considered not to constitute registrations at this time. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 15:38:08 UTC