- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 19:48:57 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
Tab and Tantek, If either of you would like your requests to be seriously considered, I would strongly suggest that they be resubmitted in a form that is free of any insults directed at either the editor or any other members of the working group. - Sam Ruby On 05/03/2011 05:34 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 14:12, Tab Atkins Jr.<jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Maciej Stachowiak<mjs@apple.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> If anyone actually wants hgroup back (as in, actually included in >>> the spec, not just dropped via a different process), they can >>> submit a revert request, or escalate the bug to an issue. If no >>> one objects, the chairs will assume there is consensus on this >>> change. >> >> Sigh. I request a revert. We shouldn't be making changes to the >> spec (even just the W3C version) solely for appeasement purposes. > > I second that request. > > The removal of hgroup smells (unscientifically) like the voice of > armchair complainers with time on their hands being considered more > strongly than the (implied, often quiet because they don't have time > to engage in trollish forums) voice of web developers / designers > that are (may be) likely using such features. Not in all cases, just > overall. To be clear: this an impression and not meant to direct or > imply criticism of any particular individual in this forum. > > I also speak from anecdotal positive personal experience having > given several HTML5 workshops and talks teaching/demonstrating use of > new HTML5 markup including<hgroup>, including mention/documentation > in a book[1] (though I believe all "how to write" HTML5 books > provide documentation of how and when to use hgroup, and *know* that > a few others "Introducing HTML5", "HTML5 for web designers" do). > > Tantek [1] http://tantek.com/html5now >
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 23:49:28 UTC