Re: longdesc spec text

On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:31:11 +0200, Laura Carlson  
<> wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>> The spec language likely needs to be carefully coordinated with:
> What text would you suggest for for longdesc in the  4.8.1 the img
> element section? I'm open to suggestions.
>> especially if its intended to encourage implementations such
>> as inline replacement, which the text above would seem to discourage.
>> Most of the quoted text looks like it belongs in the informative
>> "Rendering" section rather than in the section describing the "img"
>> element:
> We certainly could place it there. What do other people think?

Makes sense. I am wary about providing UI requirements - in the past,  
getting them wrong (e.g. accesskey) has led to almost completely  
destroying a good feature. They should certainly only be in a place that  
talks about rendering and is only informative.



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk       Try Opera:

Received on Sunday, 1 May 2011 20:33:12 UTC