- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 12:28:52 +0000
- To: public-html@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12578
Summary: The note says: "Omitting an element's start tag does
not mean the element is not present; it is implied,
but it is still there." 1.) Before the word "start
tag" should be an "optional", because in many (or all)
other cases omitting the start tag results i
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#opt
ional-tags
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
public-html@w3.org
Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/syntax.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#optional-tags
Comment:
The note says: "Omitting an element's start tag does not mean the element is
not present; it is implied, but it is still there." 1.) Before the word "start
tag" should be an "optional", because in many (or all) other cases omitting
the start tag results in an element not being present even if the appropriate
end tag is present. 2.) Before the word "implied" should be an "only", because
the critical information is not that an element exist *although* it is
implied, but that an element exists even if it is *only* implied.
Posted from: 92.225.90.210
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; de-de)
AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 1 May 2011 12:28:55 UTC