- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:19:48 -0400
- To: julian.reschke@gmx.de
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 03/12/2011 10:32 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > The plan is to issue a decision on issue 125 by 1pm EDT on Tuesday and > to either post a decision or a plan for issue 126 at the same time. Decision and plan have now been posted: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0304.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0308.html When do you plan to update your proposal for issue 148? If it is not in the next few days, we will likely proceed with a Call for Consensus on the Proposal that Philip has offered. - Sam Ruby > > -----Original message----- > > *From: *Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>* > To: *Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>* > Cc: *public-html@w3.org* > Sent: *Sat, Mar 12, 2011 15:03:12 GMT+00:00* > Subject: *Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-148 charset-detect by Amicable Resolution > > On 12.03.2011 15:42, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On 03/11/2011 03:19 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > >> > >> I object to > >> > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jan/0431.html>. It > >> contains 2 alternative proposals: > > > > Julian, do you wish to resubmit this as two change proposals, are you > > willing to revise this to express only one proposed change, or > would you > > I'm willing to revise, but not over and over again. > > Is there a chance of getting a decision on -125 and -126 before > proceeding with this one? > > If not, I can rephrase this into two separate proposals, but it'll take > some time. > > > be willing to withdraw the proposal entirely in favor of the > alternative > > that Philip presented? > > Nope, as that proposal doesn't address the problem. > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 16:20:20 UTC