RE: Normative status of author-only view of the HTML5 specification

• From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
• Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:35:18 -0700
• To: Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
• Cc: jonas@sicking.cc, nrm@arcanedomain.com, public-html@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
• Message-ID: <19953.26310.986308.600647@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com>

Paul, you are correct. If the two documents disagree after the
one is a projection of the other, then an cinsistency points to a
much deper problem.

Paul Cotton writes:
 > > Given that we would then have two documents with normative status describing how HTML is defined. Which of the two is authoritative if the two don't agree?
 > 
 > Our goal is have the two documents agree - the author-only view is generated directly from the HTML5 spec.
 > 
 > /paulc 
 > 
 > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
 > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
 > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
 > 
 > 
 > 

-- 

Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 00:36:53 UTC