- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:29:37 -0700
- To: art.barstow@nokia.com
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
I concur with the "keep both documents consistent" and it should be easy to do since the one is generated from the other. If the results are inconsistent, that would identify an inconsistency in th emain spec, which would certainly put its normative nature into question. Arthur Barstow writes: > On Jun/7/2011 2:52 PM, ext Sam Ruby wrote: > > Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive > > responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday, > > June 15, this resolution will carry. > > Support and recommend adding clarification text like Noah suggested in: > > [[ > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0118.html > > These two specifications are generated from common base text and are > intended to be entirely consistent. Both are normative and authoritative. > With respect to any matters on which they (unexpectedly) disagree, there is > a bug in at least one, and neither specification is authoritative with > respect to the point(s) of disagreement. In such cases we expect to resolve > the bug by publishing versions that are changed to be consistent. > ]] > > -AB > --
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 00:30:05 UTC