- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:18:21 +1000
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG LIST <public-html@w3.org>
I am told that right now browsers turn the html snippet that aria-describedby points to into plain text before giving it to accessibiltiy APIs and thus screen readers cannot e.g. change their accent to a different content language, or point out that there's a url to another resource. Thus, I suggest your change proposal should also include that browsers need to expose the markup of the html snippet(s) that aria-describedby points to to accessibility APIs. Cheers, Silvia. On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > I'd like to write a counter proposal. The proposal would request that > the spec specifically points out that the ARIA spec already requires > that aria-describedby can point to rich content, including <a>-links. > The proposal would further make pointing aria attributes (including > aria-describedby) to elements that are "hidden" using the @hidden > attribute legal. > > I should have time to write such a proposal before June 25th. > > / Jonas > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> 'Should HTML 5 include a longdesc attribute for images' >> >> The current status for this issue: >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/30 >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-30 >> >> This issue was reopened on March 2nd 2011: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0037.html >> >> We have a single Change Proposal to include longdesc in HTML5: >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc >> >> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit alternate Change >> Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details), in case >> anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different change than the >> specific one in the existing Change Proposal. >> >> The following Change Proposal can be resubmitted, but we strongly urge it to >> be updated to reflect the new information provided before doing so: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0393.html >> >> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by June 25th, >> 2011, we will proceed to evaluate the Change Proposal that we have received >> to date. >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 23:19:08 UTC