- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:17:56 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 02/09/2011 02:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> The poll is available here, and it will run through Thursday, February 17th: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-129-objection-poll/ >> >> Please read the introductory text before entering your response. >> >> In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only need to >> do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly strong, and >> has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked objection contained >> within a Change Proposal or by someone else's objection. The Chairs will be >> looking at strength of objections, and will not be counting votes. > > The second proposal's CP link is > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Nov/0041.html, > which is for Issue 118. Fixed. Thanks! > ~TJ - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 20:18:31 UTC