- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:00:23 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 11:01:16 UTC
please note: I repsonded to the survey, but it isn't recorded on the results page: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2011Feb/0014.html regards Stevef On 9 February 2011 19:21, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > The poll is available here, and it will run through Thursday, February > 17th: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-129-objection-poll/ > > Please read the introductory text before entering your response. > > In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only need > to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly strong, > and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked objection > contained within a Change Proposal or by someone else's objection. The > Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and will not be counting > votes. > > - Sam Ruby > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 11:01:16 UTC