- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:51:04 -0800
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > The poll is available here, and it will run through Thursday, February 17th: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-129-objection-poll/ > > Please read the introductory text before entering your response. > > In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only need to > do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly strong, and > has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked objection contained > within a Change Proposal or by someone else's objection. The Chairs will be > looking at strength of objections, and will not be counting votes. The second proposal's CP link is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Nov/0041.html, which is for Issue 118. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 19:51:58 UTC