- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:14:58 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org, "Andrew Fedoniouk" <andrew.fedoniouk@live.com>, "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news@terrainformatica.com>
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:17:21 +0200, Andrew Fedoniouk
<andrew.fedoniouk@live.com> wrote:
> Each time when I see <figcaption> I want to ask:
>
> What is conceptually wrong with using <caption> as it is in <figure>'s?
> Why do we need element with such ugly name as <figure>?
> Why other grouping elements have no such caption counterparts?
>
> It is enough to define something like this:
>
> caption { display:block; }
> table > caption { display:table-caption; }
>
> in UA's default style sheet and we can use this element with its perfect
> semantic meaning.
>
> My pardon if it was discussed already.
http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/1122
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 10:15:35 UTC