- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <andrew.fedoniouk@live.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:17:21 -0700
- To: <public-html@w3.org>
Each time when I see <figcaption> I want to ask:
What is conceptually wrong with using <caption> as it is in <figure>'s?
Why do we need element with such ugly name as <figure>?
Why other grouping elements have no such caption counterparts?
It is enough to define something like this:
caption { display:block; }
table > caption { display:table-caption; }
in UA's default style sheet and we can use this element with its perfect
semantic meaning.
My pardon if it was discussed already.
--
Andrew Fedoniouk.
http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 04:18:27 UTC