Each time when I see <figcaption> I want to ask: What is conceptually wrong with using <caption> as it is in <figure>'s? Why do we need element with such ugly name as <figure>? Why other grouping elements have no such caption counterparts? It is enough to define something like this: caption { display:block; } table > caption { display:table-caption; } in UA's default style sheet and we can use this element with its perfect semantic meaning. My pardon if it was discussed already. -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.comReceived on Friday, 26 August 2011 04:18:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:42 UTC