- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:51:04 +0200
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Steve Faulkner, Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:37:37 +0100: > I have written some stuff down about how figure and figcaption could > work for screen reader users, as currently it is not accessibility > supported in browsers or AT. > I think there may be the need to create a new role to represent > figure, probably an ARIA landmark role. > http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2011/08/html5-accessibility-chops-the-figure-and-figcaption-elements/ > > I am asking for feedback from users and implementors. > > any feedback would be appreciated +1 I defintely think that a new, default role for figure is needed. As for caption role, which you also propose, would <caption> also get the same role? And what about the problem that Rich takes up in that regard - that figcaption -- and caption has the same issue - can take flow content. [1] Perhaps the default role should not be used if it contains flow content? [1] http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2011/08/html5-accessibility-chops-the-figure-and-figcaption-elements/comment-page-1/#li-comment-14964 -- Leif Halvard Silli
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 11:51:57 UTC