- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:12:01 -0400
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html@w3.org
Le 11 août 2011 à 18:21, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > This is somewhat the way in which the W3C process is describing things > (as in: only features that are stable are allowed to enter "PR" > stage), but for whatever reason we in the W3C define maturity on a > per-feature level, but only publish on a document-level. We can publish a document with only the feature you think are mature to be published depending on the criteria the group has fixed. It is exactly the W3C Process with CR. The issue is rarely the process or the document, but the human resources needed to make the tests, the implementation reports which demonstrate interoperability for a set of features. As an example, some of the specifications of Web semantics area were TDD. The specs had been written from the tests http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#write-sample-gp http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Feb/att-0071/all.htm -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 02:12:35 UTC