Re: ISSUE-153 link-external - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

On 06/28/2011 11:01 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 'link type "external" either not useful or underspecified'
> The current status for this issue:
> At the present time we have one change proposal to remove link type
> "external":
> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit additional Change
> Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details), in case
> anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different change than
> the specific one in the existing Change Proposals.
> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by July
> 28th, 2011, we proceed to evaluate the change proposal that we have
> received to date.

As we have received no acceptable counter-proposals or alternate 
proposals, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on the proposal 
that we do have.  If anybody would like to raise an objection during 
this time, we will require them to accompany their objection with a 
concrete and complete change proposal.

If no objections are raised to this call by August 10th 2011, we will 
direct the editor to make the proposed change, and will only consider 
subsequently reopening this issue based on new information and a 
complete change proposal based on the spec's contents as it exists after 
this change is applied.

- Sam Ruby

Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 14:20:37 UTC