Re: Bug 11239

hi maciej
>Steve, are your concerns addressed by the latest patch

yes


regards

Stevef

On 29 April 2011 22:20, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:

>
> Steve, are your concerns addressed by the latest patch as well?
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
> On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> CTO Accessibility Software Group
>
> <graycol.gif>Sam Ruby ---04/29/2011 03:28:17 PM---On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM,
> Ian Hickson wrote: >
>
> From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 04/29/2011 03:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Bug 11239
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > I've tried to add a note to this effect.
> >
> > New patch on the bug:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=981
>
> Specifically:
>
> > + On platforms where the user agent cannot determine the
> > + blink period and cannot provide a default blink period, the
> > + attribute should return &minus;1.
>
> Rich, is this acceptable? Can you review the proposed patch and
> identify any other issues that that you might have with this patch?
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html