Steve, are your concerns addressed by the latest patch as well? Regards, Maciej On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > Yes. > > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > CTO Accessibility Software Group > > <graycol.gif>Sam Ruby ---04/29/2011 03:28:17 PM---On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > To: public-html@w3.org > Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS > Date: 04/29/2011 03:28 PM > Subject: Re: Bug 11239 > > > > On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > I've tried to add a note to this effect. > > > > New patch on the bug: > > > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=981 > > Specifically: > > > + On platforms where the user agent cannot determine the > > + blink period and cannot provide a default blink period, the > > + attribute should return −1. > > Rich, is this acceptable? Can you review the proposed patch and > identify any other issues that that you might have with this patch? > > - Sam Ruby > > > >Received on Friday, 29 April 2011 21:20:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:37 UTC