- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:36:31 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 04/26/2011 08:59 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > The problem we have now is that the chairs have not yet responded to: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0496.html Applying the decision as stated and reopening the issue based on new information are two separate events. > Until that is done Ian does not know what to do as our change proposal > requires that canDrawCustom be removed. Currently the Canvas 2D API > spec. has a bug whereby it allows the author to draw a custom focus ring > without using the drawFocusRing() function to drive the magnifier. The decision is clear here: "The change to remove the canDrawCustom parameter from drawFocusRing is not adopted." > If the chairs accept the change to remove canDrawCustom then Ian can > take my spec. text change in the Change Proposal. There is nothing vague > about doing a cut and paste of the sections. All changes are delimitted > by <ZZZ> and </ZZZ> as has been requested. Those changes certainly are clear. Ian: what is the problem here? > Rich > > Rich Schwerdtfeger > CTO Accessibility Software Group - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 13:37:01 UTC