Re: Draft HTML5 licensing survey

On Apr 22, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Dailey, David P. wrote:

> In Sam's Ruby's note [1] of February 2009, there were some use cases included that managed to drop out of the list being offered currently [2]. Is the omission intentional or accidental?

Can you be more specific about the omissions you see?
 - Maciej

> 
> curious,
> David
> 
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Feb/0388.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/03/html-license-options.html
> 
> ________________________________
> From: public-html-request@w3.org [public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton [Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 4:09 PM
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Cc: Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com)
> Subject: Draft HTML5 licensing survey
> 
> On March 31, the HMTL WG chairs announced the opening of a discussion period on three HTML5 licensing options [1] offered to the WG by the W3C Management and Team.  That discussion period was to be followed by a one week survey of the WG on the three licensing options starting on April 28.
> 
> At the Weekly WG meeting on Thu Apr 21 the Chairs were asked what type of survey they would be carrying out on this topic.  The Chairs have drafted a survey on the three licensing options which is available for review at [2].
> 
> Please provide any comments on the structure and instructions on this draft licensing survey in response to this message.  The Chairs will evaluate this input before posting the final survey.
> 
> /paulc
> 
> PS: Note that the draft survey is NOT open yet and WG members can review the structure and questions but you CANNOT yet provide answers.
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0757.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/html5-license-poll/
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>

Received on Saturday, 23 April 2011 02:10:50 UTC