Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence

On 04/14/2011 05:51 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>> But what we do have now is 2 specifications both claiming to be HTML5
>> that are not in agreement.
> The WHATWG spec is just HTML, not HTML5. There's a whole section (the
> first section) that goes to quite some length to explain this.

That section isn't as clear as it could be:

"Is this HTML5?  ... In short: Yes."

Additionally, it would be wonderful if the following site were updated 
to reflect the position that the WHATWG spec doesn't describe HTML5:

A concrete example of a point where this creates confusion:

... which was dropped from HTML5 by amicable consensus:

- Sam Ruby

Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 11:00:45 UTC