Re: Mozilla Proposal for HTML5 Spec Licence

hi hixie,
you wrote:

> The WHATWG spec is just HTML, not HTML5. There's a whole section (the
> first section) that goes to quite some length to explain this.

the whatwg spec says [1]

"Is this HTML5?
In short: Yes."



[1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/introduction.html#is-this-html5?

On 14 April 2011 10:51, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>>
>> But what we do have now is 2 specifications both claiming to be HTML5
>> that are not in agreement.
>
> The WHATWG spec is just HTML, not HTML5. There's a whole section (the
> first section) that goes to quite some length to explain this.
>
> --
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
>



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html

Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 10:01:34 UTC