- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:25:13 -0500
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, public-html-request@w3.org, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Message-ID: <OFEB4C5B0D.7CD22C44-ON86257870.0074BF2A-86257870.0075AA45@us.ibm.com>
Ian, Others will not state this buy I will. The specification change did not modify the default roles of h1-h6 because the original document section specified it correctly, There is no reason to require a change for something that is the same. Furthermore, the ARIA specification clearly states what the role and levels apply to for H1 - H6. It is a heading with a level. People making change requirements are not going to make a change for something that did not change. Furthermore, nothing in the decision stated that the default roles for H1-H6 should change either. If you think this is true please point us to that text in the decision. Otherwise, you are wasting people's time. Maciej, I would like to see you point us to where the discrepancy is in the chairs request as well. I don't need you wasting our time either regardless of your position as co-chair. Furthermore , why would would the default roles and levels for H1-H6 be anything other than a role of header with a corresponding aria-level that matches. You are being absurd and ludicrous to think otherwise. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger CTO Accessibility Software Group From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, public-html-request@w3.org, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> Date: 04/12/2011 03:13 PM Subject: Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129 Sent by: public-html-request@w3.org On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > I have provided am updated set of spec changes for review by the working > group: http://www.html5accessibility.com/tests/aria-changesv2.html This does not accurately reflect the decision. If we're going to correct the mistakes in the decision, we should correct all of them, not just the ones you want to correct. Maciej suggested that instead we should apply the decision as the chairs made it, and then file bugs to address the issues arising. I suggest we follow his advice instead of trying to fix the mistakes here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 21:25:49 UTC