Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129

For those who would like to review the diff, it can be downloaded from here:

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=976&action=edit


On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> 
>> Note that Maciej didn't specify who needs to provide the full spec text 
>> or diff.  Last time Steve turned the request around in 21 hours, 54 
>> minutes, and 12 seconds.  Anybody care to set a new record? :-)
> 
> I attached a diff to the bug around the same time I did the revert. As far 
> as I know it accurately and completely represents the decision, including 
> the issue that was raised earlier which I had previously "corrected" due 
> to my not realising that the decision could be taken literally on that 
> particular matter (which in retrospect was quite foolish of me).
> 
> I wasn't sure what "posted to the WG" meant in Maciej's e-mail, so I 
> assumed attaching the diff to the bug was enough. Hopefully this e-mail 
> closes the loop on that.
> 
> -- 
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
> 

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 03:25:49 UTC