Re: Revert request for r5981, and moving forward on ISSUE-129

On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
> 
> Note that Maciej didn't specify who needs to provide the full spec text 
> or diff.  Last time Steve turned the request around in 21 hours, 54 
> minutes, and 12 seconds.  Anybody care to set a new record? :-)

I attached a diff to the bug around the same time I did the revert. As far 
as I know it accurately and completely represents the decision, including 
the issue that was raised earlier which I had previously "corrected" due 
to my not realising that the decision could be taken literally on that 
particular matter (which in retrospect was quite foolish of me).

I wasn't sure what "posted to the WG" meant in Maciej's e-mail, so I 
assumed attaching the diff to the bug was enough. Hopefully this e-mail 
closes the loop on that.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 03:15:27 UTC