- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:13:48 +0200
- To: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 07.04.2011 23:58, Kurt Cagle wrote: > ... > 2) Google produces RDFa output in a number of different contexts, and in > general does it right. This is also true of Wikipedia (and its > associated Freebase and DBPedia systems) and a number of news > organizations, of which the New York Times and Reuters are both useful > examples. Basing standardization of RDFa usage on one platform > (Facebook) seems to be a questionable precedent to use, even if it > reflects the CURRENTLY largest provider. There are indications that RDFa > interest is growing dramatically among larger commercial content > providers, which usually also indicates that the number of organizations > that ARE using RDFa correctly are also likely to be growing. > ... Absolutely. If Facebook doesn't do it right, let's raise bug reports. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 10:14:25 UTC