- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:59:56 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Sam Ruby, Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:35:42 -0400: > On 09/15/2010 10:56 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new revisions of the >> following documents in accordance with the Working Group Heartbeat >> requirements, with a publish date in early October: >> >> HTML 5: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/ >> >> HTML+RDFa: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/ >> >> HTML Microdata: http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/ >> >> HTML Canvas 2D Context: http://dev.w3.org/html5/2dcontext/ >> >> HTML: The Markup Language: http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/ >> >> HTML/XHTML Compatibility Authoring Guidelines: >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-xhtml-author-guide/html-xhtml-authoring-guide.html >> >> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives: >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ >> >> Additionally, and as we have done with previous republications of the >> HTML5 draft, the chairs would like to ask Anne to update the HTML5 diffs >> from HTML4 to reflect the latest changes. >> >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/html4-differences/ >> >> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive >> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday, >> September 22th, this resolution will carry. > > Hearing no objections, the chairs will ask MikeSmith to work back > with each of the document authors to prepare documents ready for > publication. The intent is to publish this set of drafts in early > October. I object to publishing the HTML5 spec and the Differences spec. Either the HTML5 spec must entirely drop the _vendor/vendor-- attributes. Or the HTML5 spec must mark it as controversial - as well as link it to the outcome of ISSUE-41. If the _vendor/vendor-- attributes are not removed, then the Differences author is requested to familiarize himself with the content of the HTML5 spec, and - thereafter - to update the Differences document with information about the _vendor/vendor-- extensibility solution. I am willing to file bugs, if the chairs think it is necessary. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 24 September 2010 15:00:29 UTC