- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:13:30 -0400
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 09/13/2010 04:53 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> On 09/13/2010 04:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >>>> >>>> I've seen a lot of asdflkasd;jads bugs as a result of the bug form. If >>>>> people are complaining now... >>> >>> Do you have alternative proposals? >> >> To be clear, I am happy with the current system. > > Ok. (Though I'm wondering if that is with your chair hat on, or with > your WG member hat on?) Fair question. With my WG hat on, I am not concerned about the volume, though I can see that people could differ. With my co-chair hat on (though without having first checked with my co-chairs), I think that it is vital that emails are sent to the list for every non-editorial bug, and that people can't opt out(*). If it improves things to include editorial bugs (and spam), I am OK with that. Including the body is also an excellent idea. > / Jonas (*) Of course, people can apply client filters. My goal is only to eliminate excuses. My observation is that most of the work of the working group happens in bugzilla, which I will argue is a very good thing. I want to allow everybody an opportunity to participate. The alternative is to force everybody back onto the list, and I don't think anybody would be in favor of that.
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 21:14:12 UTC