W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Request to Revert revision 1.4525

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:37:58 +0200 (CEST)
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010281035030.17652@sirius>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> On Oct 28, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:28:01 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>>> Anyway, now that it has been brought up - what do you think of the warning box in the recently published Navigation Timing Working Draft:
>>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-navigation-timing-20101026/>?
>>> How would others in the WG feel about a similar warning box in the status section of HTML WG drafts?
>> I don't care what the text is, but I think the message should be visible anywhere you end up in the spec -- people often search for a specific section of the spec and thus never see the SotD.
> My personal preference would be not to have a constantly visible message 
> (since that gets distracting), but rather something that is at least 
> partly visible in the first screenful of content on a reasonable-size 
> screen. That seems to be the case for the Navigation Timing warning box, 
> but the HTML5 draft at least has much lengthier front matter.

I think that just having the warning at the top of the page would not be 
sufficient in many cases. I strongly perfer having the warning overlay the 
content in some way and allowing it to be dismissed by the reader if they 
so choose.
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 08:38:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:06 UTC