Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-85 by Amicable Consensus

On 10/13/2010 05:56 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> At this time, bug 8000 is now being pursued as a part of ISSUE-129, and
> bugs 9871, 9872, and 9936 have been CLOSED. Accordingly, the chairs are
> issuing a call for consensus at this time. If there are no objections,
> we will close ISSUE-85 on October 20th.
>
> Closing ISSUE-85 will not affect bug 8000 or ISSUE-129.

Hearing no objections, I've gone ahead and marked issue 85 as closed.

> - Sam Ruby
>
> On 10/12/2010 08:16 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:
>> Hi Sam,
>> I have added bug 8000 to issue 129
>> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8000
>>
>> the contents of
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAonanchor will be be
>> moved into http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAinHTML5
>> and the further requested rationale is provided in this section of the
>> proposal:
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAinHTML5#Guiding_factors_for_decisions_on_ARIA_Role_use:
>>
>> What is going to happen in regards to: ISSUE-109: aria-section-title
>> <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/109> ? and the resulting poll?
>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-109-objection-poll/results
>> I have asked this question to the chairs on several occasions, but
>> received no reply. Does it have to be included in issue129?
>> the following can be marked closed:
>> b) Bug 9871. Editor's response was given in August. Should this bug be
>> CLOSED or added to ISSUE-129 or pursued as a separate issue?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9871
>>
>> c) Bug 9872. Should this bug be CLOSED? The Bug triage sub-team
>> indicated that they accept closing this bug as is.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9872
>>
>> d) Bug 9936. Current status is NEEDSINFO and the Bug triage sub-team
>> says that it is not high enough of a priority
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9936
>>
>> e) ISSUE-85 anchor-roles. Should this be CLOSED as being superseded by
>> ISSUE-129, or rescoped?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85
>>
>> On 12 October 2010 12:33, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net
>> <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/12/2010 05:01 AM, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote:
>>
>>
>> ISSUE-129: replace or modify the ARIA section of the HTML5 spec
>> [HTML 5 spec]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/129
>>
>> Raised by: Steve Faulkner
>> On product: HTML 5 spec
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> What is the status of:
>>
>> a) Bug 8000. You have a change proposal, for which a request was
>> issued for you to update it, and you indicated that you do no plan
>> to pursue it. Yet you referenced it recently in the bug itself. Do
>> you plan to update the change proposal as requested, or should this
>> bug be CLOSED?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8000
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAonanchor
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0555.html
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jul/0022.html
>>
>> b) Bug 9871. Editor's response was given in August. Should this
>> bug be CLOSED or added to ISSUE-129 or pursued as a separate issue?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9871
>>
>> c) Bug 9872. Should this bug be CLOSED? The Bug triage sub-team
>> indicated that they accept closing this bug as is.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9872
>>
>> d) Bug 9936. Current status is NEEDSINFO and the Bug triage
>> sub-team says that it is not high enough of a priority
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9936
>>
>> e) ISSUE-85 anchor-roles. Should this be CLOSED as being superseded
>> by ISSUE-129, or rescoped?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> with regards
>>
>> Steve Faulkner
>> Technical Director - TPG Europe
>> Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium
>>
>> www.paciellogroup.com <http://www.paciellogroup.com> | www.wat-c.org
>> <http://www.wat-c.org>
>> Web Accessibility Toolbar -
>> http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>

Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 18:02:26 UTC