- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:07:08 -0400
- To: Getify <getify@gmail.com>
- CC: public html <public-html@w3.org>
On 10/12/10 11:57 AM, Getify wrote: > Yes, sites will need to keep their LABjs > up to date, but that's far less impactful to overall page behavior than > say asking them to keep jQuery up to date Sites don't keep jQuery up to date. Not even close. They don't even _try_ to keep it up to date. They just grab a jquery version, treat it as a given, and develop against it. This means it maybe gets updated every time there's a wholesale site redesign. At least this describes the sites I've seen with my browser developer hat on. > Since LABjs is so > small and highly focused, I think the risk to sites keeping it up to > date is minimized compared to jQuery. I would fully expect that sites wouldn't update their existing LABjs installations as well. Again, short of site redesigns. > While we'd like to think that proper cache headers are a given Just like updating libraries... ;) -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 16:07:45 UTC