Re: Issue-85 (was: ISSUE-129: replace or modify the ARIA section of the HTML5 spec)

Hi Sam,

I have added bug 8000 to issue 129
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8000

the contents of
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAonanchor will
be be moved into
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAinHTML5and the
further requested rationale is provided in this section of the
proposal:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAinHTML5#Guiding_factors_for_decisions_on_ARIA_Role_use
:

What is going to happen in regards to: ISSUE-109:
aria-section-title<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/109>? and
the resulting poll?
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-109-objection-poll/results

I have asked this question to the chairs on several occasions, but received
no reply. Does it have to be included in issue129?


the following can be marked closed:

b) Bug 9871.  Editor's response was given in August.  Should this bug be
CLOSED or added to ISSUE-129 or pursued as a separate issue?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9871

c) Bug 9872.  Should this bug be CLOSED?  The Bug triage sub-team indicated
that they accept closing this bug as is.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9872

d) Bug 9936.  Current status is NEEDSINFO and the Bug triage sub-team says
that it is not high enough of a priority

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9936

e) ISSUE-85 anchor-roles.  Should this be CLOSED as being superseded by
ISSUE-129, or rescoped?

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85



On 12 October 2010 12:33, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 10/12/2010 05:01 AM, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>>
>> ISSUE-129: replace or modify the ARIA section of the HTML5 spec [HTML 5
>> spec]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/129
>>
>> Raised by: Steve Faulkner
>> On product: HTML 5 spec
>>
>
> Thanks!
>
> What is the status of:
>
> a) Bug 8000.  You have a change proposal, for which a request was issued
> for you to update it, and you indicated that you do no plan to pursue it.
>  Yet you referenced it recently in the bug itself.  Do you plan to update
> the change proposal as requested, or should this bug be CLOSED?
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8000
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAonanchor
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jun/0555.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jul/0022.html
>
> b) Bug 9871.  Editor's response was given in August.  Should this bug be
> CLOSED or added to ISSUE-129 or pursued as a separate issue?
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9871
>
> c) Bug 9872.  Should this bug be CLOSED?  The Bug triage sub-team indicated
> that they accept closing this bug as is.
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9872
>
> d) Bug 9936.  Current status is NEEDSINFO and the Bug triage sub-team says
> that it is not high enough of a priority
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9936
>
> e) ISSUE-85 anchor-roles.  Should this be CLOSED as being superseded by
> ISSUE-129, or rescoped?
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html