W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2010

Re: ISSUE-124 rel-limits - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:20:53 +0000 (UTC)
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1011101719120.11018@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/124 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-124
> 
> - We have a single change proposal to allow use of the "nofollow" and 
> "noreferrer" relations on <link> elements
> 
> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit alternate Change 
> Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details), in case 
> anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different change than 
> the specific one in the existing Change Proposals.

Are we aware of any user agents that are intending to implement the 
proposed feature? If not, would the lack of such intent be sufficient for 
the chairs to decide against the change proposal even in the absence of 
other proposals, or does a proposal automatically win if it is not 
formally opposed by a counter-proposal?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:21:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:06 UTC