- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:53:11 +0100
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public html <public-html@w3.org>
On 05.11.2010 14:42, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On 11/05/2010 07:29 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >>> Per Maciej's request, I'm emailing my guess about my ability to deliver a Change Proposal about registering link relations at the W3C: >>> >>> I'm guessing I can get it done next week. I.e. before Nov 15th. >> >> Just to be clear, this is for ISSUE-27, rel-ownership ? >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27 > > Yes. To give context, during the session today about link relations, Mike Smith demoed the XPointer registry at the W3C: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/ > > Currently the Change Proposals for issue 27 propose using the IANA registry; and leaving the current state of the spec, where it points to a wiki. After seeing the demo of the XPointer registry, a number of folks in the room were interested in the XPointer-like approach of a lightweight registry at the W3C. Therefore it seemed expedient to get a Change Proposal documenting this approach, even though we are technically past the deadline. For the record: The pages at paramsr.us -- http://paramsr.us/link-relation-types/ -- seem to provide almost the same service for the IANA registry (or will when finished). Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 13:53:55 UTC