- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 09:08:03 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 03 May 2010 00:47:41 -0400 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > As always, questions, concerns or comments are very welcome - please > send them to the HTML WG mailing list. Minor editorial fix: "This specification has been jointly developed by the RDFa Task Force and the HTML Working Group and is currently being published by the HTML Working Group to further discussions there." "RDFa Task Force" should be "RDFa Working Group". Also: in section C.3, members of the RDFa WG are acknowledged; members of the HTML WG are not. Any reason? Lastly: "The document should conform to the constraints expressed in the HTML 4.01 + RDFa 1.1 Document Type Definition located in the Appendix." I don't think that's true for HTML5+RDFa documents. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 08:09:43 UTC