- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 21:32:25 -0400
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 05/03/2010 04:08 AM, Toby Inkster wrote: > Minor editorial fix: > > "This specification has been jointly developed by the RDFa Task > Force and the HTML Working Group and is currently being > published by the HTML Working Group to further discussions > there." > > "RDFa Task Force" should be "RDFa Working Group". Fixed. > Also: in section C.3, members of the RDFa WG are acknowledged; members > of the HTML WG are not. Any reason? Oversight on my part. Fixed. > Lastly: > > "The document should conform to the constraints expressed in > the HTML 4.01 + RDFa 1.1 Document Type Definition located in > the Appendix." > > I don't think that's true for HTML5+RDFa documents. Fixed. source diff: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-20100505/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&f=h HTML diff (to previous Working Draft heartbeat): http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/WD-rdfa-in-html-20100505/diff-20100304.html -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarming Goes Open Source http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/02/01/bitmunk-payswarming/
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 01:32:58 UTC